1. Local Implementing Organisations
1.1. UNDP
1.1.1. Key personnel
1.1.1.1. Eric Overvest
1.1.2. Interest
1.2. Danish Refugee Council
1.2.1. Key personnel
1.2.2. Interest
1.2.2.1. Ideal focus: Livelihoods Improvements
1.3. UNHCR
1.4. Save the Children
1.4.1. Interest
1.4.1.1. Interested in being implementing partner. Potentially full involvement at a later stage.
1.4.1.2. Leadership programmes
1.4.1.2.1. could be part of the training programme after a first cohort
1.4.1.3. Education focus
1.4.2. Context
1.4.3. Key Questions:
1.4.3.1. What are the key impacts if Save the Children gets involved?
1.4.3.2. What constraints are there due to strong curricular focus?
1.4.3.2.1. None as it seems
1.5. USAID
1.5.1. Interest
1.5.1.1. Basic Skills Training
1.5.1.2. Lots of low cost equipment
1.5.1.2.1. 100 tablets
1.5.2. Programmes:
1.5.2.1. ForUS
2. Location
2.1. Urban
2.2. Settlement
3. UNHCR Geneva
3.1. Key personnel
3.1.1. Steven Corliss | Director of Support
3.1.2. Betsy Greve | Head of Office at UNHCR
3.1.3. Jakob Oster Associate | Livelihoods Officer
3.1.4. Ziad | Head of Livelihoods
3.2. Interest
3.2.1. UNHCR Exchange training intervention
3.2.2. UNHCR Exchange as an inter agency collaboration tool for communities of practice
3.2.2.1. Communities of Practice
3.2.2.1.1. Creation and collaboration challenges
3.2.2.2. Communities of Interest
3.2.2.2.1. Content creation challenges
4. Research Stakeholders
4.1. NYU
4.2. University of Illinois
4.3. University of Denver
4.4. Columbia University
5. Methodology Partners
6. Equipment
6.1. More innovative equipment in the future
6.1.1. MIT
6.1.2. Libraries without Border
6.1.3. Cybersmart
6.2. Main Equipment Choice
6.2.1. Raspberry Pies
6.2.1.1. Kebyboard
6.2.1.2. Cables
6.2.1.3. Monitor
6.2.2. Google Android Device
6.2.2.1. notebook like / Chromebook
6.2.2.2. Tablet
7. Local Labour Market opportunities, apprenticeships
7.1. Apprenticeship opportunities
7.2. TELCOM
7.2.1. no networking
7.2.2. SONY Erikkson
7.2.3. CISCO
7.3. Tech companies
7.3.1. Microsoft
7.3.1.1. Status
7.3.1.1.1. Already want to be Exchange partners
7.3.1.1.2. Want to implement Microsoft MixIT
7.3.1.1.3. Have lots of ICT Content
7.3.2. Cisco
8. Content
8.1. Corporate
8.1.1. Microsoft
8.1.1.1. Status
8.1.1.1.1. Already want to be Exchange partners
8.1.1.1.2. Want to implement Microsoft MixIT
8.1.1.1.3. Have lots of ICT Content
8.1.2. Cisco
8.1.3. sony ericsson
8.1.4. Google
8.1.5. HP
8.1.5.1. Status
8.1.5.1.1. Already have HP Life, partners of UNHCR Exchange
8.2. Training Sector
8.2.1. PERA: Functional Skills
8.2.2. OCR Computing
8.3. OER
8.3.1. Humanitarian Sector
8.3.1.1. Warchild
8.3.1.2. USAID
8.3.1.3. Save the Children
8.3.1.4. Commonwealth of Learning
8.3.1.5. British Council
9. Tech development needed
9.1. Offline App
9.1.1. Read in Devices
9.2. App localisation
9.3. Coding API
9.4. Custom App
9.4.1. onboarding experience
10. Expansion opportunities
10.1. Innovation Lab in Camp
10.2. Girls tutorship programme
10.3. Online Delivery Scaling
11. Pedagogy
11.1. Learning Path
11.1.1. Interaction points
11.1.2. Level of interactivity
11.1.3. Learning Styles
11.2. Core Skills
11.2.1. Entrepreneurship
11.2.2. Employability
11.2.2.1. Private less popular than in the government sector
11.2.2.2. What are the key employability skills for the government sector?
11.2.2.3. IDPs vs refugees and their needs
11.3. Learning objectives and Outcomes
11.3.1. Community Leadership
11.4. Alternative Curriculum and Learning plans for self learners
11.4.1. Cohort participants could become advocates for the free autonomous learning offering offered in parallel for those who can use their smartphone to access the app
12. RISK Management
12.1. What is the relationship between IPDs and refugees in the settlement and urban environment?
12.1.1. Concepts of intercultural, integrative collaboration are key
12.2. Connectivity
13. Identifying the trainers
13.1. Previous programmes run by INGOs might be able to provide contacts
13.2. difference between Urban and Settlement/camp environment
13.3. relevant: Mix of cohort
13.4. Local Tech entrepreneurs
13.5. Gender balance between the trainers? Should it be mixed trainer gender in the sessions?
14. KPIs
14.1. Employment
14.2. Direct transition into Employment after assessment and certification
14.3. Nr of Participants who become self reliant
15. Participant Selection Criteria
15.1. we need to consider the existing gender balance and define what our role is within that?
16. Contracts / Paying Contractors
16.1. Alternative 1: Direct payment, treating all traiers and lead practitioner as consultants
16.1.1. Responsbility
16.2. Alternative 2: Local Organisation
16.2.1. Mechanism for control