Online Mind Mapping and Brainstorming

Create your own awesome maps

Online Mind Mapping and Brainstorming

Even on the go

with our free apps for iPhone, iPad and Android

Get Started

Already have an account? Log In

Abortion by Mind Map: Abortion
0.0 stars - reviews range from 0 to 5




Pro-choicers want to improve life in the society as a whole. They use politics and legal means to extend nuturance in to the culture as a whole, they define reproduction and emphasize the communities responsible for taking care of the depends. They reject that women are only childbearing , domestic caretakers

Nuturance is seen as a biological factor .Nurturance is seen as moral authority over female action, this definition confines them to the home and gives a economical,social and political disadvantage

Member profile

Prochoicer were women from the 1940 who around this time had children of their own. Feminism offer them resources which were no available before


antifamily and godless


Kay Bellevue is a key activist here , she been active since 1972. Kay was married young and her view point is base from the drawbacks that come with motherhood. Her story share the element of most of the activist in line with her Janice Sundstrom, from a big family but had single child experience. Her stories surround the effect of not having too much kids and choosing between church beliefs( she is Roman Catholic) and what is right for her

Pro Life


Pro-llifer reject abortion on the basis of it turning women into structural men, because it denies nurturance and reproduction as a result of sex. in their view point abortion threatens the social order of opposites Pro-lifers fight against the commercialization of human dependency. The zygote being ripped from the women represent this. The ability of women to carry a child is the very essence of difference between the two sexes. This difference is what they want to protect

They define nurtuance as an achievement not a natural process.

Member Profile

Pro-lifers were born in the 1920’s and 1950’s composed mostly of women who are stay at home moms


Right wing housewives unaware of the world.


Shirly a widow who emphasis her choice on the impact of her son on society. Helen, who story is based on the view of trying to fix her relationship with her dead mother and be thankful for birth after the death of her sister. Roberta on the commercialism of human relations


Pro-lifer could use politics to close so now they target the client

Common ground

Both sides try to naturalize abortion through sexuality,work and motherhood.

Both sides claim femeinism

Both seek to enhance the position of women within society

Boths side claim to speak the truth and these claims leave no place for the alternative interpetion of abortion

Both the prochoice and prolifer movement got help by appearing under-attack

Activist want abortion to fit in the value scheme of society.

General informatrion

The article emphasize the nature of abortion

More stories were collected from right to life vs right to choice this may show author bias

Activist are mostly Caucasian, middle class and female

The women in the study were mostly separate in generational shifts

In the east reproduction is the central to society, in the west this theme has been replaced with the urge for money and power and remain secondary to the ambitious nature.

The right to life is a battle between motherhood and the wage labor