Pueblos Vivos program vs Surf City program

1. BENEFITS

2. Concentrates on bringing new life to rural areas.

3. PUEBLOS VIVOS PROGRAM

4. Advances local customs and traditional arts.

5. Stimulates citizen involvement and makes citizens feel they have a stake in things.

6. Sustains tourism that doesn’t destroy the community or the environment.

7. CONS

8. Could need substantial financing and resources.

9. Can be sluggish in implementation owing to bureaucracy.

10. May gentrify and lose local identity.

11. SUFR CITY PROGRAM

12. BENEFITS

13. Propels the local economy via tourism.

14. Encourages beach conservation and sustainability.

15. Lures a younger demographic and surf culture.

16. Enforces more infrastructure development in coastal areas.

17. CONS

18. This could boost tourism and all the environmental impacts that come with it.

19. If this attracts a lot of people, is there capacity for that in the local infrastructure?

20. Might this be the beginning of the end for the place's unique local culture?

21. SHARED ASPECTS

22. Both initiatives strive to strengthen local economies.

23. Concentrate on community engagement and growth.

24. Foster sustainability and environmental consciousness.

25. Possess the potential for both beneficial and detrimental effects on local cultural practices.