1. Coal commission
1.1. Membership does not reflect variety of stakeholders impacted
1.2. pressure by utilities companies, trade unions and regional governments
1.3. Institutional structure
1.3.1. Meetings
1.3.1.1. Frequence
1.3.2. Deliberating procedures
1.3.2.1. Decision making process
1.4. Lobbying
1.5. The Government role
2. Lessons for other phase outs
2.1. Ensure commission has balanced membership so result considers needs of wider group
2.2. Rebound effect
3. Stakeholders
3.1. The society
3.1.1. Citizens
3.1.2. The Media
3.1.3. Environmentalists
3.1.4. The miners
3.2. European Union
3.3. The national government
3.3.1. Coal commission
3.3.1.1. Scientists
3.3.1.2. Industrial associations
3.3.1.3. Labour Unions
3.3.1.4. Subnational governments and administrations
3.3.1.5. Others
3.3.1.5.1. busines
3.3.1.5.2. civil societies
3.3.1.5.3. politicians
3.4. Political parties
3.4.1. Oppostion
3.4.2. Governamental
3.5. Regional governments
3.5.1. Lusatia
3.5.2. Central Germany
3.5.3. Rheinland Pfalz
3.6. Trade Unions
3.7. Utility companies
4. The national mood
4.1. Culture
4.2. History
4.3. The energy system as a whole
4.3.1. Incumbents
4.4. popular support
4.5. Carbon lock-in for energy generation and consumer use
5. Policies
5.1. International
5.1.1. Paris Agreement
5.1.1.1. SDG's
5.1.1.2. Climate goals
5.2. Supranational
5.2.1. EU
5.2.1.1. Emission Trading Scheme
5.2.1.1.1. CO2 certificates
5.3. National
5.3.1. CO2-tax
5.3.2. Coal phase out Act
5.3.3. Fossil fuel subsidies
5.3.3.1. gas
5.3.3.1.1. oil
5.3.4. Strukturstärkungsgesetz
5.3.5. National Climate Plan 2050
5.4. Sub national
5.4.1. Regulations
6. Energy security
6.1. Nuclear phase out
6.2. Deployment of variable renewable energies (Solar and wind)
6.3. Electricity grid infrustructure
6.4. Innovative technologies (storage, Power- to-X (hydrogen), CCS)
6.5. Adequacy of alternative energy Sources
6.5.1. Will the renewable sources be able to sustain energy security in the absence of coal energy
6.5.2. Consumers' unencumbered access to renewable sources of energy
6.5.3. Replacement fuel (cogeneration)
6.5.3.1. biomass
6.5.3.1.1. gas
7. Negative and positive impacts
7.1. Economic Impact
7.1.1. Potential reduction in economic activity / GDP
7.1.2. Potential price increase?
7.1.3. Employment
7.1.4. Value chain
7.1.5. Energy exports and imports
7.1.5.1. coal, nuclear, gas and oil
7.2. Social Impact
7.2.1. Many stakeholders not represented in commission so views not considered in decision making.
7.2.2. Proper use of funds essential to protect jobs and communities
7.2.3. Unemployment
7.2.4. Destruction of villages
7.2.5. Health issues (due to air pollution)
7.2.6. Radicalisation of society
7.3. Innovation and technology
7.3.1. Investment in innovation to replace coal can bring economic benefits and create jobs
7.3.2. Innovation development will benefit other industries etc.
7.4. Environmental & climate impacts
7.4.1. (De)forestation
7.4.1.1. e.g. Hambacher Forst
7.4.2. Gas and oil imports
7.4.2.1. CO2 emissions