1. Types of evaluation
1.1. Planing • Implementation • Outcome
2. Techniques of evaluation
2.1. • Teaching dossiers • Student ratings • Peer observations • Interviews • Portofolios • Classroom assesment
2.1.1. Teaching Dossiers: Usually done in the form of some written document, as an submission assessment of students
2.1.2. Student ratings: Rating of teaching by students
2.1.3. Peer observations: Colleagues judge teaching quality by observation, peer observation is usually useful for formative evaluation
2.1.4. Interviews: Used in teaching award nominations
2.1.5. Portafolios: Appropiateness of course goats and objetives
2.1.6. Classroom Assesment: Effectivess of teaching on learning, can be used in timely way to hel instructors identify gaps
3. Choosing an evaluation method
3.1. why in process: purpose of evaluation when in process: formative vs. Summative style of evaluation: nlaboratory vs. Field type of measures: qualitative vs. Quantitative leve lof information: high level vs. Low level resources avaiable: time, subjects, tools and equipmente, expertise etc.
4. Definition of evaluation
4.1. Evaluation is a process that critically examines a program. It involves collecting and analyzing information about a program's activities, characteristics, and outcomes.
5. Quantitative and Qualitative
5.1. QUANTITATIVE
5.1.1. -Focus on numbers/ numeric values -Who, what, were,when -Match with outcomes about knowledge and comprehension (define, classify, recall, recognize). -Allows for measurement of variables -Uses statiscal data analysis -Maybe generalize to greater population with larger samples -Easly replicated
5.2. QUALITATIVE
5.2.1. -Focus on text/ narrative from respondents -Why, how - Match with outcomes about application, analysis, synthesis, evaluate -Seeks to explain and undersand -Ability to capture "elusive" evidence of student learning and development