EURO NCAP - DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

Iniziamo. È gratuito!
o registrati con il tuo indirizzo email
EURO NCAP - DESTRUCTIVE TESTING da Mind Map: EURO NCAP - DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

1. simulated dummies

1.1. history

1.1.1. availability of the first supercomputers

1.1.1.1. suitable software

1.1.2. first use while nuclear bomb testing

1.2. FEM-method

1.2.1. FEM-dummies

1.2.1.1. "Future of dummies"

1.3. Crash test simulation

2. Data analysis

2.1. Crash test simulation

2.1.1. Vrtual recreation of a car crash test

2.2. The beginnings

2.2.1. Military fighter plane into a nuclear power plant (May 30, 1978)

2.2.1.1. First virtuall crash simulation (Volkswagen Polo) 1986

2.3. Sensors

2.3.1. Seat Belt Tension Transducer​

2.3.1.1. Strain Gage

2.3.1.1.1. Load Sensor

2.4. Cameras

2.4.1. High-Speed-Cameras

2.4.1.1. Phantom C320

2.5. Benefits

2.5.1. results without actual destructive testing

2.5.2. permits optimization of the design before a real prototype

2.5.3. less time and money as an actual crash test

2.5.4. solving problems that would have been nearly impossible without the help of a computer

3. Data evalution

3.1. Simulation Software measX

3.1.1. Finite element method

3.1.1.1. Macro element method

4. financial support

4.1. EU member countries

4.2. European Comission

4.3. Federation International de l'automobil (FIA)

4.4. ADAC

5. Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier

5.1. 50km/h to 50km/h

5.2. 50% overlap

5.3. evaluate occupant injuries

5.3.1. driver vehicle

5.3.2. opponent vehicle

6. attention assistant

6.1. in case of impairments

7. crash avoidance

7.1. autonomous emergency braking

7.2. autonomous steering interventions

8. rescue

8.1. equally crucial determant

8.2. emergancy service

8.2.1. quickly locate the accident

8.2.2. extricate occupants

8.2.3. administer medical assistance

9. Hybrid

9.1. I

9.1.1. 1971

9.2. II

9.2.1. 1972

9.3. III

9.3.1. Hybrid III Family

9.3.1.1. widely used

9.3.1.2. 50th percentile male

9.3.1.3. 95th percentile male

9.3.1.4. 50th percentile female

9.3.1.5. ten, six, and three-year-old child dummies

9.4. THOR

9.4.1. most modern

9.4.2. New at EU-NCAP

10. dummies

10.1. Construction

10.1.1. Vinyl "skin"

10.1.2. six ribs made of steel and synthetic plastic

10.1.3. outfitted with advanced electronic tools

10.1.4. neck, spine and pelvis made of rubber

10.1.5. constructed of aluminum and steel

10.2. history

10.2.1. cadaver testing

10.2.2. volunteer testing

10.2.3. animal testing

10.3. Evolution

10.3.1. "Sierra Sam"

10.3.1.1. "VIP-50"

10.3.1.2. "Sierra Stan"

11. star rating

11.1. 1 star safety: Marginal crash protection and little in the way of crash avoidance technology

11.2. 2 star safety: Nominal crash protection but lacking crash avoidance technology

11.3. 3 star safety: At least average occupant protection but not always equipped with the latest crash avoidance features

11.4. 4 star safety: Overall good performance in crash protection and all round; additional crash avoidance technology may be present

11.5. 5 star safety: Overall excellent performance in crash protection and well equipped with comprehensive and robust crash avoidance technology

12. certain test

12.1. far side

12.1.1. potential interaction between occupants

12.1.1.1. small cars

12.1.1.1.1. center airbags

13. influence

13.1. make life saving technologiy widely available

13.2. inform/advice buyers about safety technology

13.3. encourage manufacterers to povide ever greater levels of safety