1. PEER ASSESSMENT
1.1. IT`S AN ASSESSMENT MADE BY PEERS, IN WICH THEY JUDGE AND HELP THEIR PARTNERS/PEER, FOLLOWED BY A TEACHER`S ORIENTANTION.
1.1.1. IDENTIFY
1.1.1.1. What has been done well.
1.1.2. EXPLAIN
1.1.2.1. Why it has been done well.
1.1.3. SUGGEST
1.1.3.1. Ways to improve.
2. SELF ASSESSMENT
2.1. IT`S AN ASSESSMENT THAT CONSISTS IN A JUDGEMENT MADE BY THE LEARNER HIM SELF ABOUT HIS PERFORMANCE. (READING AS AN EXAMPLE)
2.1.1. I AM ABLE
2.1.1.1. To deduce and infer information and meaning from the text.
2.1.2. I CAN GIVE
2.1.2.1. A personal response to the text and refer to aspects of language to justify my views.
2.1.3. I UNDERSTAND
2.1.3.1. The ways in wich meaning and information are conveyed.
2.1.4. I CAN EVALUATE
2.1.4.1. How authors achieve their effects.
2.1.5. I CAN FORM
2.1.5.1. A critical response by evaluating a character motives.
2.1.6. I CAN IDENTIFY
2.1.6.1. Different layers of meaning.
2.1.7. I CAN SELECT
2.1.7.1. The essential points from the text.
3. LEARNER FEEDBACK
3.1. CONSISTS IN A DOUBLE FEEDBACK, WHERE THE TEACHER TELLS THEIR STUDENT ABOUT THEIR PROGRESS AS WELL AS THE STUDENTS TELLS THEIR TEACHER ABOUT THE ONGOING CLASS.
3.1.1. GOAL-REFERENCED
3.1.1.1. Learner know`s whether they are on track towards a goal or need to change course.
3.1.2. TANGIBLE AND TRANSPARENT
3.1.2.1. Learner can understand exactly how your feedback relates to the task at hand.
3.1.3. ACTIONABLE
3.1.3.1. Learners know specifically what actions to take to move towards his/her goal.
3.1.4. USER-FRIENDLY
3.1.4.1. Learner finds the feedback appropriate to his/her cognitive level.
3.1.5. TIMELY
3.1.5.1. Learner receives feedback while the attempt and effect are still fresh in his/her mind.
3.1.6. ONGOING
3.1.6.1. Learner has multiple opportunities to learn and improve towards the ultimate goal.
3.1.7. CONSISTENT
3.1.7.1. Learner can adjust his/her performance based on stable, accurate, and trust-worthy feedback.