1. Key questions
1.1. What does success look like?
1.2. What are we trying to measure?
1.3. How might the results break down?
1.3.1. Wait until results are in to decide?
1.3.2. Detailed paradigm
1.3.2.1. Destructiveness
1.3.2.2. Incapacity
1.3.2.3. Blindness
1.3.2.4. Pre-competence
1.3.2.5. Competence
1.3.2.6. Proficiency
1.3.3. Simplified paradigm
1.3.3.1. Aware
1.3.3.2. Inclusive
1.3.3.3. Integrated
2. Follow-up
2.1. How will this improve our advocacy?
2.2. Where to apply the survey next?
3. Attitudes
3.1. Discomfort
3.2. Admiration
3.3. Have your attitudes changed?
4. Knowledge
4.1. Terminology/symbology
4.2. History
4.2.1. Movement
4.2.1.1. Exclusion
4.2.1.1.1. LGB
4.2.1.1.2. Feminism
4.2.1.2. Silencing
4.2.1.3. Pathology
4.2.1.4. Gatekeepers
4.2.1.5. Disenfranchising
4.2.2. With HRC
4.3. VIP's
4.4. Arts/Literature
4.5. Culturally sensitive communication
4.6. Resources
4.6.1. Books
4.6.1.1. HRC pubs
4.6.2. Websites
4.6.3. Training
4.6.3.1. HRC Diversity Leaders training
4.6.3.2. Gender Identity and our Faith Communities
4.6.4. Events
4.6.4.1. TDOR
4.6.4.2. Conferences
5. To assess
5.1. Is there a disparity between LGB and T advocacy?
5.2. Attitudes toward trans people
5.3. Attitudes toward trans inclusion
5.4. Barriers to effective trans advocacy
5.5. Levels of cross-cultural skill
6. Survey
6.1. Levels
6.1.1. Grassroots
6.1.2. Functional/Staff
6.1.3. Organizational/Leadership
7. Stereotypes
7.1. Confused
7.2. Deceitful
7.3. Never fit in
7.4. Extremes of presentation
7.5. Sexualized
7.6. Fetishized/Objectified
7.7. Sick
8. Awareness
8.1. Discrimination
8.1.1. Employment
8.1.2. Accomodations
8.1.3. Healthcare
8.2. Violence
8.3. Legislation
8.3.1. Federal
8.3.1.1. Hate crimes
8.3.1.2. ENDA
8.3.2. State
8.3.3. Local
8.4. Inclusion
8.4.1. "Why the T?"
8.5. Cisgender privilege
9. Relationships
9.1. How to quantify?
9.2. Number of trans people you know
9.2.1. For how long?
9.2.2. How close?