HandHeld Learning
MirandaMod
Here is a url where you can learn more about concept mapping
http://www.snipurl.com/conceptmapping
There needs to be an understanding of both
the place of formal and informal learning with
mobile devices.
Issues in the use of
ubiquitous technologies
Students' own devices
'banned' in schools.
it was announced this week that some
BSF schools are going to allow
student devices, Some already do:), does involving student's own technology, e.g. mobile
phones, allow for comparison of makes and models and
therefore teasing if a student has older technology or none
at all?, This is why investment in devices is
essential: a level field for all
learners., or perhaps there needs to be some 'safety net'
provision - a bank of devices students could access
(on a semi permanent basis) till their circumstances
change
Having a consistent and achievable approach
by teachers when there are too many devices
to learn
many of the skills transferable - and learn
through play / enjoyment of what it can offer
(persoanl benefit)
Youtube banned in many
schools.
Understand that good teaching doesnt equal
lots of kit and open access (necessarily) -
good teaching in this context still needs
developing
We have way of white-listing
selected YouTube content and giving
access
but one of the affordances of YouTube is
that you can search and find relevant
and related content
One of the issues with youtube is
not the content itself but the
comments., agreed there are various
procedures and tools to deal with
these e,g (commentsnob)
Theories in the use of
ubiquitous technologies
What students want is to collaborate, communicate, this is what we need to provide access to through technologies, and teach how to do this effectively and safely
Content may be brilliant, but if there is no communication / collaboration, it will not be accessed.
Impact on formal learning
Impact on informal learning
Students like to add to their mobile resources
at home Eg YouTube videos and podcasts,
they like to share with their families too
How can we reconceptualise assessment, so that it better
reflects the ways in which knowledge is developed
collaboratively? Or should we give up on the nostrum of
online learning?
eportfolios may be a step in
the right direction
Students contributions and creations shared in
an online space can be used as assessment of
student understanding.
What is the value of the learning
experience balanced again the expense and
the risk?
Similarly - what is the risk in a
competitive world of not
utilising
New node
We teach drugs & sex education so why not
teach how to implement handheld learning
as an effective learning tool?
Can these technologies make learning for
professionals more personal and
relevant?
Can these technologies make learning for
teachers more personal and relevant?
Yes. Teachmeets,
Edtechrounup, Flashmeetings
etc.
I
agree it is especially relevant
in enabling teachers to build
up Personal/Professional
Learning Networks
Can these technologies make learning
for students more personal and
relevant?
Yes. Particularly if learner's
own technologies can be
used.
A device provided to all students in a class /
school can still be personalised in many ways
and can be managed more easily.
Relevant as it is how they learn out with the school setting. It is the tools of their
trade and generation. It enables learning anytime, anyplace anywhere and creates a
shift from time zone learning in a class to learning when child is ready.
Personalisation, schools provide all other tools so they should provide device to
ensure all children have the same access to a range of tools and they can then
personalise the device.
about concept mapping as a
knowledge creation tool
It's great, we use Inspiration all
the time.
Mindmeister adds an element
of anywhere/anytime
contributions.
collaborative features create an
element of collective
intelligence
Its the online or cloud
element that adds the real
value
and there are a growing number
of these
The research/practitioner reference I
(John Cook) was asked for in the
session was:'Mobile Learning:
Structure, Agency, Practices'. See p89
http://bit.ly/zUwuu, due out November,
written with n.pachler IoE and other
colleagues.