The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Rocket clouds
The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it by Mind Map: The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it

1. Keywords

1.1. Accept

1.1.1. Accept vs. agree I accept it, but I disagree with it.

1.1.2. Knowledge is accepted = valid true knowledge

1.1.3. consent to receive or undertake (something offered).

1.1.4. believe or come to recognize (a proposition) as valid or correc

1.2. Measure

1.2.1. assess the importance, effect, or value of (something).

1.3. Quality

1.3.1. the standard of something as measured against other things of a similar kind; the degree of excellence of something.

1.4. Knowledge

1.4.1. facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. understanding comprehension

1.4.2. awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a fact or situation. awarenes

1.5. People

1.5.1. human beings in general or considered collectively.

1.5.2. Persons sharing a particular characteristic, or set of characteristics, that causes them to be regarded as a group, more or less precisely defined or designated Sharing characteristics

1.5.3. Types of people Is the acceptance of certain people matter more than others? Everyone vs. experts Difference between these two groups of people

2. Key Phrases

2.1. Quality of knowledge

2.1.1. How do we judge the quality of knowledge in different AOKs? High quality knowledge is priceless priceless Low quality knowledge is worthless worthless

2.2. How many people

2.2.1. What types of people are discussing here?

2.2.2. Non-expert vs. experts Do certain people's acceptance matter more than others?

2.3. Best measure

2.3.1. How to quantify a discipline

2.3.2. One of the way is looking at acceptance, but there must be other ways to measure it.

2.4. Accept it

2.4.1. How do we understand accept? Knowledge is accepted=valid true knowledge

2.4.2. Accept vs. Agree

3. Rewrite

4. Rewrite

5. Connections to Classes

5.1. Human Science

5.1.1. The Development of psychology history Solomon Asch's experiment Sense perception, faith, intuition, memory, reason Methodology [Theory of emotion changed over time] James-Lange Theory of emotion: our emotions are caused by our interpretation of bodily reactions. Sense perception, memory, imagination Historical development Methodology The development of psychology Aristotle: Father of psychology

5.1.2. Paradigm shift in Human Science

5.1.3. Methodology used in HS Some AOK personal knowledge might play a bigger role in accepting knowledge What role does personal knowledge play in the measuring the quality of knowledge?

5.1.4. Knowledge production

5.1.5. Scope & Application Scope Topics Features Abstract Involve more thoughts and emotions No correct answer Various ideas The aim of applications Make predictions based on laws and models Gain insight and understanding Example of applying some of the applications to study a topic: The data shows we want to end inequality. Here’s how to start …

5.1.6. Paradigm shifts in HS The movement known as the cognitive revolution moved away from behaviourist approaches to psychological study and the acceptance of cognition as central to studying human behaviour.

5.2. The arts

5.2.1. Scope & Application Art as a media for Communication Theory Art is the language of emotion. Arts as Education Theory Provoking emotion which influences behaviour Provokes the use of question to eliminate assumptions Does art weaken our ability to lead rational lives? Arts can be related to all aspects of TOK: History, Maths, Natural Science, Indigenous knowledge, Religion and Human Science Perspectives of Art The Artist and Audience How do you determine the value of art and whether it is good or bad? Do you rely on perception? Do you rely on the actual cost of the artwork?

5.2.2. Methodology used in the arts

5.2.3. Noble price literature Translation work WOK Framework Area The development of new genre

6. KQs

6.1. How do we judge the quality of knowledge in different AOKs?

6.1.1. KC: The quality of knolwedge is affecting by personal perspectives

6.1.2. CC: The quality of knowledge