1. Stay AS-IS on Postilion Windows
1.1. RFP for Linux Based Switch
1.2. TerminalDriver
1.3. In-House Settlement Solution
2. RPS- UP Framework
2.1. SCOPE
2.1.1. Linux Postilion with SQL
2.1.1.1. Access to Domestic,International GWY Schemes
2.1.1.2. Access to Acquirer /Issuer Fraud SOA
2.1.1.3. Access to ATM Terminal Drivers
2.1.1.4. Access to Digital channels
2.1.1.5. Access to POS, ECR acquiring
2.1.2. Deploy custom NeoTerm Terminal Driver into UP?
2.1.3. Settlement APIs with UP SOA
2.1.4. In-House Settlement Solutions
2.1.4.1. Re-factor to PosGreSQL
2.2. RESOURCES
2.2.1. Linux Postilion with SQL
2.2.1.1. 6 Postilion Resources
2.2.2. In-House Reconcilation Solutions
2.2.2.1. Reskill / 10 New Hire
2.2.3. Settlement APIs with UP SOA
2.2.3.1. Hire or Re-Skill 5 Resources?
2.3. COST
2.3.1. UP Framework
2.3.1.1. 3 Million CAPEX
2.3.1.2. 3 Million OPEX
2.3.2. In-House Reconciliation Solution
2.3.2.1. 500K OPEX
2.3.3. Terminal Driver
2.3.3.1. No New Hire
2.4. Timelines
2.4.1. RPS Postilion
2.4.1.1. 2years
2.4.2. In-House Settlement Solution
2.4.2.1. 2years
2.4.3. Terminal Driver
2.4.3.1. Not Applicable
3. Run InHouse
3.1. SCOPE
3.1.1. Postilion
3.1.1.1. Replace NIX Application LoadBalancer
3.1.1.2. Consolidate GWY Services
3.1.1.3. Replace ATMApp, PosTerm,Hyosung drivers
3.1.2. In-House Settlement Solution
3.1.2.1. WebTools
3.1.2.2. Settlement Product
3.1.3. Terminal Driver
3.2. RESOURCES
3.2.1. Postilion
3.2.1.1. Hire 20 Postilion resources- DEV/Impl/Testing
3.2.1.2. Consolidate GWY Services
3.2.1.3. Replace ATMApp, PosTerm,Hyosung drivers
3.2.2. In-House Settlement Solution
3.2.2.1. No New Hire
3.2.3. Terminal Driver
3.2.3.1. No New Hire
3.3. COST
3.3.1. Postilion
3.3.1.1. 3 Million OPEX
3.3.2. In-House Settlement Solution
3.3.2.1. 500K OPEX
3.3.3. Terminal Driver
3.3.3.1. No New Hire
3.4. Timelines
3.4.1. Postilion
3.4.1.1. 3years
3.4.2. In-House Settlement Solution
3.4.2.1. 1years
3.4.3. Terminal Driver
3.4.3.1. Not Applicable