1. 5 Stars - W3C model http://fr.slideshare.net/cygri/edf2012-the-web-of-data-and-its-five-stars-13234131
2. Citation
2.1. Amsterdam Manifesto (projet Force11)
2.2. Recommandations
2.2.1. Sciences dures
2.2.1.1. DataCite Partnership of data centers to assign persistent identifiers to datasets (initially using DOIs)
2.2.2. Sciences Sociales
2.2.2.1. ICPSR
2.2.2.2. DataPass
2.3. Ball A, Duke M: How to Cite Datasets and Link to Publications. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre; 2012.
2.4. Poster-ANDS-Citation des données http://www.ands.org.au/guides/data_citation_poster.pdf
2.5. A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html
3. Certification/accréditation des entrepôts de données
3.1. Open Data certificates
3.1.1. ODC questionnaire 4 niveaux de certification
3.2. Projet PREPARDE http://bit.ly/ZhYHZl
3.2.1. Whyte, A.; Callaghan, S., 2013. Perspectives on the Role of Trustworthy Repository Standards in Data Journal Publication. IASSIST. Cologne - Allemagne: 2013/05/31. http://fr.slideshare.net/angusawhyte/iassist-preparde-whyte
3.3. Data Seal of Approval
3.4. European Framework for Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories
3.4.1. Basic - Extended - Formal
3.5. Trusted Digital Repository : 3 niveaux de certification
3.6. 1. Doorn P, SDillo I, Van Horik R: Lies, Damned Lies and Research Data: Can Data Sharing Prevent Data Fraud? 8 2013.
3.7. Notion de réplicabilité
3.7.1. Reproducibility Initiative
3.7.2. Vlaeminck GRF, Sven: Data Management in Scholarly Journals and Possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX. Liber Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 2013, 23(1):48-79.
4. Peer-Review
4.1. White, J.W.; van Evert, F.K., 2008. Publishing Agronomic Data Agronomy Journal, 100 (5): 1396-1400. 10.2134/agronj2008.0080F (objective of this paper : propose mechanisms for peer-reviewed publication of agricultural sets)
4.2. Lawrence, B.; Jones, C.; Matthews, B.; Pepler, S.; Callaghan, S., 2011. Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6 (2): 1-34. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/181
5. Qualité-Structuration-Formatage des jeux de données
5.1. Green T: "We Need Publishing Standards for Datasets and Data Tables”. OECD Publishing White Paper. In: OECD Publishing. OECD 2010: 1-29.
5.2. Research Data MANTRA (Management Training) http://datalib.edina.ac.uk/mantra/introduction.html
5.3. Data Documentation Initiative http://www.ddialliance.org/what
6. Identifiant
6.1. DOI
6.2. ARK
6.3. PURL
6.4. Datacite
6.5. EZID
6.5.1. EZID: Long term identifiers US- California University
7. Propriété-paternité-droit
7.1. Couture, M., 2010 La diffusion et le partage de l'information scientifique. Propriété intellectuelle et université. Chapitre 7 : pp. 1-24. http://archipel.uqam.ca/3460
7.2. Open Data Commons (à l'image des CC) http://opendatacommons.org/ http://opendefinition.org/okd/francais/
8. Evaluation
8.1. Altmetrics
9. Rôle des institutions
9.1. Développer la culture du partage et de la publication des données
9.2. Collaborer avec les entrepôts
9.2.1. Exemple : UK Data Archive + University of Essex http://data-archive.ac.uk/
10. Comportement / Chercheurs
10.1. Freins, obstacles ...
11. Publication des données
11.1. Motivation
11.1.1. Réutilisation des données par d'autres
11.1.2. Citation des données indépendamment de la publicaton
11.1.3. ... etc
11.2. Data Paper
11.2.1. Data Journals
11.2.1.1. Editeurs
11.2.1.1.1. Pensoft
11.2.1.2. Exemples
11.2.1.2.1. GigaScience
11.2.1.2.2. Datasets Papers in Ecology
11.2.1.2.3. F1000Research : bouleverse les canons de l'édition scientifique http://www.gfii.fr/fr/amico/361
11.2.1.3. Cycle - processus de dépôt
11.2.1.3.1. How to submit a data paper ? (Guy, M., & Duke, M. (2013, mai 31). The Rise of the Data Journal. Présenté à IASSIST, Cologne, Allemagne. Consulté à l’adresse http://fr.slideshare.net/MariekeGuy/the-rise-of-the-data-journal)
11.2.1.3.2. Whyte, A.; Callaghan, S., 2013. Perspectives on the Role of Trustworthy Repository Standards in Data Journal Publication. IASSIST. Cologne - Allemagne: 2013/05/31. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jw4964t.pdf
11.2.2. articles pertinents / définition
11.2.2.1. Chavan, V.; Penev, L., 2011. The data paper : a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. Bmc Bioinformatics, 12 (Suppl. 15. n°2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2
11.2.2.2. Kunze, J.A.; Cruse, P.; Hu, R.; Abrams, S.; Hastings, K.; Mitchell, C.; Schiff, L.R., 2011. Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jw4964t
11.3. Enriched publication
11.3.1. Journaux classiques Sharing Policy
11.3.1.1. Etudes diverses
11.3.1.1.1. Etude JoRD : voir traduction rapide DLH : https://drive.google.com/?hl=fr#folders/0B4DozebvONPoal9BZk92ODBFbFE
11.3.1.1.2. Preparde
11.3.1.1.3. ANDS
11.3.1.1.4. EDaWax (domaine Economique). Vlaeminck, G.R.F.; Sven, 2013. Data Management in Scholarly Journals and Possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX. Liber Quarterly. The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 23 (1): 48-79. http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114595
11.3.1.1.5. Etude - Sciences exactes Stodden, V.; Guo, P.; Ma, Z., 2013. Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by Journals. PLoS ONE, 8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111 (cf. résumé / Diigo)
11.3.1.2. critères - Pts critiques
11.3.1.2.1. Peer review
11.3.1.2.2. Hébergement
11.3.1.2.3. Archivage pérenne
11.3.1.2.4. Paternité - Authoship
11.3.1.3. Liste - Répertoire
11.3.1.3.1. Journal-open-data-policies - Liste Wiki OAD http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_open-data_policies
11.3.2. Documents pertinents
11.3.2.1. Reilly S, Schallier W, Schrimpf S, Smit E, Wilkinson M: Report on integration of data and publications. In. Edited by Exchange OfD: s are beginning to embrace the opportunity; 2011.
12. Dépôt
12.1. Data - Data set Objet indépendant
12.1.1. Entrepôt / repository
12.1.1.1. Git(GitHub)
12.1.1.2. NCBI Geo http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193
12.1.1.3. Scientific Data (Nature)
12.1.1.4. FlowRepository (annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications) Spidlen, J.; Breuer, K.; Rosenberg, C.; Kotecha, N.; Brinkman, R.R., 2012. FlowRepository: A resource of annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications. Cytometry Part A, 81A (9): 727-731. 10.1002/cyto.a.22106
12.1.1.5. Figshare
12.1.1.5.1. Hahnel, M., 2012. Figshare: a new way to publish scientific research data. http://wellcometrust.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/figshare/ Thaney, K., 2013. Figshare announces new partnership with the Public Library of Science. http://www.digital-science.com/blog/posts/figshare-announces-new-partnership-with-the-public-library-of-science
12.1.1.6. DataOne (US) http://www.dataone.org/what-dataone
12.1.1.7. Disciplinaire
12.1.1.7.1. Pangeae
12.1.1.7.2. Dataverse
12.1.1.7.3. Dryad
12.1.1.8. Institutionnel
12.1.2. Listes - Répertoires - Bdds
12.1.2.1. Data Citation Index - Thomson
12.1.2.2. Liste d'entrepôts
12.1.2.2.1. r3data.org
12.1.2.2.2. Databib.org
12.1.2.2.3. Open Data Directory http://dir.w3.org/directory/pages/landing-page.xhtml?view
12.1.2.2.4. Data Repositories - Liste Wiki OAD http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Data_repositories
12.1.3. Recommandations / entrepôt
12.1.3.1. Callaghan S: Guidelines on recommending data repositories as partners in data publication. Draft guidelines, version 7 (8 july, 2013) Preparde Project.2013. http://fr.slideshare.net/angusawhyte/iassist-preparde-whyte
12.1.3.2. World Data System - ICSU, 2011. Certification of WDS members. 1-5 p. http://icsu-wds.org/images/files/WDS_Certification_Summary_11_June_2012.pdf