1. 5 Stars - W3C model http://fr.slideshare.net/cygri/edf2012-the-web-of-data-and-its-five-stars-13234131
2. Citation
2.1. Amsterdam Manifesto (projet Force11)
2.2. Recommandations
2.2.1. Sciences dures
2.2.1.1. DataCite Partnership of data centers to assign persistent identifiers to datasets (initially using DOIs)
2.2.2. Sciences Sociales
2.2.2.1. ICPSR
2.2.2.2. DataPass
2.3. Ball A, Duke M: How to Cite Datasets and Link to Publications. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre; 2012.
2.4. Poster-ANDS-Citation des données http://www.ands.org.au/guides/data_citation_poster.pdf
2.5. A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html
3. Certification/accréditation des entrepôts de données
3.1. Open Data certificates
3.1.1. ODC questionnaire 4 niveaux de certification
3.2. Projet PREPARDE http://bit.ly/ZhYHZl
3.2.1. Whyte, A.; Callaghan, S., 2013. Perspectives on the Role of Trustworthy Repository Standards in Data Journal Publication. IASSIST. Cologne - Allemagne: 2013/05/31. http://fr.slideshare.net/angusawhyte/iassist-preparde-whyte
3.3. Data Seal of Approval
3.4. European Framework for Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories
3.4.1. Basic - Extended - Formal
3.5. Trusted Digital Repository : 3 niveaux de certification
3.6. 1. Doorn P, SDillo I, Van Horik R: Lies, Damned Lies and Research Data: Can Data Sharing Prevent Data Fraud? 8 2013.
3.7. Notion de réplicabilité
3.7.1. Reproducibility Initiative
3.7.2. Vlaeminck GRF, Sven: Data Management in Scholarly Journals and Possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX. Liber Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 2013, 23(1):48-79.
4. Peer-Review
4.1. White, J.W.; van Evert, F.K., 2008. Publishing Agronomic Data Agronomy Journal, 100 (5): 1396-1400. 10.2134/agronj2008.0080F (objective of this paper : propose mechanisms for peer-reviewed publication of agricultural sets)
4.2. Lawrence, B.; Jones, C.; Matthews, B.; Pepler, S.; Callaghan, S., 2011. Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6 (2): 1-34. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/181
5. Qualité-Structuration-Formatage des jeux de données
5.1. Green T: "We Need Publishing Standards for Datasets and Data Tables”. OECD Publishing White Paper. In: OECD Publishing. OECD 2010: 1-29.
5.2. Research Data MANTRA (Management Training) http://datalib.edina.ac.uk/mantra/introduction.html
5.3. Data Documentation Initiative http://www.ddialliance.org/what
6. Publication des données
6.1. Motivation
6.1.1. Réutilisation des données par d'autres
6.1.2. Citation des données indépendamment de la publicaton
6.1.3. ... etc
6.2. Data Paper
6.2.1. Data Journals
6.2.1.1. Editeurs
6.2.1.1.1. Pensoft
6.2.1.2. Exemples
6.2.1.2.1. GigaScience
6.2.1.2.2. Datasets Papers in Ecology
6.2.1.2.3. F1000Research : bouleverse les canons de l'édition scientifique http://www.gfii.fr/fr/amico/361
6.2.1.3. Cycle - processus de dépôt
6.2.1.3.1. How to submit a data paper ? (Guy, M., & Duke, M. (2013, mai 31). The Rise of the Data Journal. Présenté à IASSIST, Cologne, Allemagne. Consulté à l’adresse http://fr.slideshare.net/MariekeGuy/the-rise-of-the-data-journal)
6.2.1.3.2. Whyte, A.; Callaghan, S., 2013. Perspectives on the Role of Trustworthy Repository Standards in Data Journal Publication. IASSIST. Cologne - Allemagne: 2013/05/31. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jw4964t.pdf
6.2.2. articles pertinents / définition
6.2.2.1. Chavan, V.; Penev, L., 2011. The data paper : a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. Bmc Bioinformatics, 12 (Suppl. 15. n°2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2
6.2.2.2. Kunze, J.A.; Cruse, P.; Hu, R.; Abrams, S.; Hastings, K.; Mitchell, C.; Schiff, L.R., 2011. Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jw4964t
6.3. Enriched publication
6.3.1. Journaux classiques Sharing Policy
6.3.1.1. Etudes diverses
6.3.1.1.1. Etude JoRD : voir traduction rapide DLH : https://drive.google.com/?hl=fr#folders/0B4DozebvONPoal9BZk92ODBFbFE
6.3.1.1.2. Preparde
6.3.1.1.3. ANDS
6.3.1.1.4. EDaWax (domaine Economique). Vlaeminck, G.R.F.; Sven, 2013. Data Management in Scholarly Journals and Possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX. Liber Quarterly. The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 23 (1): 48-79. http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114595
6.3.1.1.5. Etude - Sciences exactes Stodden, V.; Guo, P.; Ma, Z., 2013. Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by Journals. PLoS ONE, 8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111 (cf. résumé / Diigo)
6.3.1.2. critères - Pts critiques
6.3.1.2.1. Peer review
6.3.1.2.2. Hébergement
6.3.1.2.3. Archivage pérenne
6.3.1.2.4. Paternité - Authoship
6.3.1.3. Liste - Répertoire
6.3.1.3.1. Journal-open-data-policies - Liste Wiki OAD http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_open-data_policies
6.3.2. Documents pertinents
6.3.2.1. Reilly S, Schallier W, Schrimpf S, Smit E, Wilkinson M: Report on integration of data and publications. In. Edited by Exchange OfD: s are beginning to embrace the opportunity; 2011.
7. Identifiant
7.1. DOI
7.2. ARK
7.3. PURL
7.4. Datacite
7.5. EZID
7.5.1. EZID: Long term identifiers US- California University
8. Propriété-paternité-droit
8.1. Couture, M., 2010 La diffusion et le partage de l'information scientifique. Propriété intellectuelle et université. Chapitre 7 : pp. 1-24. http://archipel.uqam.ca/3460
8.2. Open Data Commons (à l'image des CC) http://opendatacommons.org/ http://opendefinition.org/okd/francais/
9. Evaluation
9.1. Altmetrics
10. Dépôt
10.1. Data - Data set Objet indépendant
10.1.1. Entrepôt / repository
10.1.1.1. Git(GitHub)
10.1.1.2. NCBI Geo http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193
10.1.1.3. Scientific Data (Nature)
10.1.1.4. FlowRepository (annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications) Spidlen, J.; Breuer, K.; Rosenberg, C.; Kotecha, N.; Brinkman, R.R., 2012. FlowRepository: A resource of annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications. Cytometry Part A, 81A (9): 727-731. 10.1002/cyto.a.22106
10.1.1.5. Figshare
10.1.1.5.1. Hahnel, M., 2012. Figshare: a new way to publish scientific research data. http://wellcometrust.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/figshare/ Thaney, K., 2013. Figshare announces new partnership with the Public Library of Science. http://www.digital-science.com/blog/posts/figshare-announces-new-partnership-with-the-public-library-of-science
10.1.1.6. DataOne (US) http://www.dataone.org/what-dataone
10.1.1.7. Disciplinaire
10.1.1.7.1. Pangeae
10.1.1.7.2. Dataverse
10.1.1.7.3. Dryad
10.1.1.8. Institutionnel
10.1.2. Listes - Répertoires - Bdds
10.1.2.1. Data Citation Index - Thomson
10.1.2.2. Liste d'entrepôts
10.1.2.2.1. r3data.org
10.1.2.2.2. Databib.org
10.1.2.2.3. Open Data Directory http://dir.w3.org/directory/pages/landing-page.xhtml?view
10.1.2.2.4. Data Repositories - Liste Wiki OAD http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Data_repositories
10.1.3. Recommandations / entrepôt
10.1.3.1. Callaghan S: Guidelines on recommending data repositories as partners in data publication. Draft guidelines, version 7 (8 july, 2013) Preparde Project.2013. http://fr.slideshare.net/angusawhyte/iassist-preparde-whyte
10.1.3.2. World Data System - ICSU, 2011. Certification of WDS members. 1-5 p. http://icsu-wds.org/images/files/WDS_Certification_Summary_11_June_2012.pdf
11. Rôle des institutions
11.1. Développer la culture du partage et de la publication des données
11.2. Collaborer avec les entrepôts
11.2.1. Exemple : UK Data Archive + University of Essex http://data-archive.ac.uk/