with our free apps for iPhone, iPad and Android

Get StartedAlready have an account? Log In

Conceptual Models (CM) for
Learning Algebra in Hong Kong
Secondary School
by thomas chiu
# Conceptual Models (CM) for
Learning Algebra in Hong Kong
Secondary School

## Conceptual Learning

### facilitate learning by

### provided an learning
environment for

### support higher order thinking

## Design

### Represention

### interaction

### consistent

### layout

### situative persepctives

### help

### content

### New node

### importan concept

## Content (Algebra)

### procedural knowledge

### conceptual Knowledge
(mathematical concept)

### Characteristics

## Its importance

### support the new learning
enviroment

### support meaningful learning

### improve learning
and teaching
processes

### Learning algebra issue in Hong
Kong (age 12 to 18)

## Use of CM for
instruction

### Support for aquistion of
meaningful learning

### Design for Task for algebra
learning in lesson or self
learning(package)

## Problems of
conceptual Learning

### the conceptual is not well
understood

### it is difficult to define
Mathematical concepts

## Background (the
construction of
mathematical
concepts)

### traditional teaching

### conceptual learning

## Conceptual Change

### ontological perspective

### mental model

### concept map

## Types of Learners

### experience learners

### novice learner

## Number of
Conceptual Models

0.0 stars - 0 reviews
range from 0 to 5

Bodemer

interacting

experiencing

exploring

involving

decoding

integrating text and graphics with existing knowledge

developing multi-modal thinking and reasoning

re-capturing knowledge

re-discoverinfg knowledge

re-developing knowledge

having different knowledge

having different experience

having different interpretation

having mixed knowledge

having holistic knowledge

constructing new knowledge

leaners' reflection

deep understanding

new knowledge

own interpretation and expression

Ainsworth (2006), Lowe 1999, Lewalter 2003, Mayor 2003, Patti Shank, adobe book: Multimedia learning Book: Cambridge handbookof Multimedia learning

Mayer 2001, Paivio 1986, Rieber

Visual, Pictures, graphical representation, diagram, tables, lines, Words, equation, expression, number and symbol, theorems, notation, symbolic expressions, formula, figures

churchill, mayer, learning and instruction

allow to change parameters, variable

control curve

control table

adobe multimedia learning

placed navigation element

familiar look

adobe mutlimedia learning

moderate colour

simple design, no decoration

divide the related concepts into different sections

explanation for control interface

pre training

no redundant information

suitable amount of concept

signal principal (Mayer)

alert (audio)

colour change (optional)

baykul 1999, Ma 1999, Bali 1998

fact, values and numbers

symbol, identification between different parts, delta, symbols for root

principle, component in the theory, theory for solving quadratic equations, formula for delta, two different real numbers, two same real numbers, no real number, nautre of roots, sum of root, product of root

rules, arithmetic, indices

graphical representation, its nature

procedure, Multiplying and Dividing Monomials’, factorization

equations, Polynomials, different look of quadratic equation, (ax+b)^2=c, (ax+b)^2-c=0, ax^2+bx+c=0

functions, idea of input-processing-output to the meaning of dependent and independent variables

mathematical concepts

baykul 1999, Ma 1999, Bali 1998baykul 1999, Ma 1999, Bali 1998

relationships between procedural knowledge, identify the most appropriate strategy to solve quadratic equation, further exploration on properties of quadatic graphs, identify the best formula to solve the mathematical problems, identify the best method to solve the real life problems, explore the effects of transformation on the functions from tabular, symbolic and graphical perspectives, visualize the effect of transformation on the graphs of functions when giving symbolic relations

conceptual in conceptual knowledge

existing supporting learning material, low opinion from teachers on the existing supporting learning material, low rate of usage of the existing supporting learning material

handling the variable items

traditional teaching, focus on distributive peoperty, focus on manipulative skills, cognitive obstacles and differences in levels, rich in content and skill-based, teacher-centred, directed students' thought processes, narrow the focus of the discussion, lead role, Transmission approach, examination-oriented

difficulties students faced, weaknesses in algebratic thinking, alarming in HK mathematical issue, misunderstanding: treating letters as as genealized numbers of variables, difficulty in producing relational and extended abstract responses, demonstrated a coherent argument and capacity of hypothetical thinking, student has little or no opportunity for students have the need of the development of conceputal understanding

text book, procedural paradigm, emphasis on learning computational skills, pupil -centred

Book: Learning and Instruction (Mayer 2008)

Semantic Knowledge

Conceptual knowledge

Schematic knowledge

Prodcedural knowledge

Strategic knowledge

decalarative knowledge

With help of other types of learning object, approach 1, presentation object, instruction learning and teaching(before), information object, instrucion learning and teaching(before), simulation object, instruction learning and teaching (before), practice object, drill and practice (after), contextual representation, situation learning (after), approach 2, self learning with CM, practice object, drill and practice (after), contextual representation, situation learning (after)

CM is one of the solutions for the existing problem

Ferdinando Arzarello, Ornella Robutti and Luciana Bazzini

symbolic reconstructive approach, tranmission, listening, observing

can create obstacles to learning

construction of a rich experiential base

perceptuo-motor approach

I prefer this perspective as it is more suitable for secondary school students

conceptual change learning model

Hasemann & Mansfield 1995, Doerr & Browers 1999