Assessment

Six Sigma Template Map

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Rocket clouds
Assessment by Mind Map: Assessment

1. Master Black Belts

1.1. Management

1.1.1. Tapped by Champions

1.2. Responsibilities include:

1.2.1. Assistance to Champions

1.2.2. Guiding and mentoring Black and Green belt members

1.2.3. Statistical tasks ensuring Quality

1.2.4. Ensuring practical application of the Six Sigma method across different functions and departments

2. Reliability

2.1. DMAIC

2.1.1. D- Define

2.1.1.1. The Problem

2.1.1.2. The customer's voice

2.1.1.3. The project goals

2.1.2. M- Measure

2.1.2.1. Key aspects of the current process

2.1.2.1.1. Collect data

2.1.3. A - Analyze

2.1.3.1. the data to determine cause-and-effect relationships

2.1.3.1.1. ensure all factors have been considered

2.1.3.1.2. identify the Root Cause of the defect under investigation

2.1.4. I - Improve

2.1.4.1. the process based upon data

2.1.4.1.1. Design of Experiements

2.1.4.1.2. Poka Yoke | mistake proofing

2.1.4.2. Create the future state process

2.1.4.2.1. establish pilot programs to test process capability

2.1.5. C - Control

2.1.5.1. the future state process

2.1.5.1.1. any derivations must be corrected before they result in future defects

2.1.5.2. implement control systems

2.1.5.2.1. statistical process control

2.1.5.2.2. production boards

2.1.5.2.3. visual workplaces

2.1.5.3. Continually monitor and control

2.2. DMADV of DFFS

2.2.1. D - Define

2.2.1.1. Goals that are inline with both customer demands, as well as Enterprise Strategy

2.2.2. M - Measure

2.2.2.1. Identify CTQ's (Critical To Quality)

2.2.2.2. Product Capabilities

2.2.2.3. Production process capability

2.2.2.4. Risks

2.2.3. A - Analyze

2.2.3.1. To design and develop alternative processes

2.2.3.2. Create a broad reaching design

2.2.3.3. Analyze and evaluate design capability

2.2.4. D - Design

2.2.4.1. Details

2.2.4.2. Optimize the design and prepare for..

2.2.4.3. Design verification

2.2.4.4. Various simulations may be required for optimization

2.2.5. V - Verify

2.2.5.1. The design

2.2.5.2. Establish Pilot and test verification programs

2.2.5.3. Implement the new process and deliver it to it's new owner.

3. Validity

3.1. Executive Leadership

3.1.1. C level executives

3.1.2. Responsibilities include:

3.1.2.1. Establishing a clear vision under Six Sigma practices

3.1.2.2. Providing other Six Sigma members with support and tools to innovate

3.2. Does the test measure what it was intended to measure?

3.2.1. Upper level management

3.2.2. Responsibilities include:

3.2.2.1. Practical implementation of the Six Sigma goal (as set by Executive Leadership) across the business

3.2.2.2. Acting as mentors to Black Belt Six Sigma members

3.3. Types of validity measurement

3.3.1. Content validity

3.3.2. Criterion-related evidence

3.3.2.1. "The content validity evidence for a test is established by inspecting test questions to see whether they correspond to what the user decides should be covered by the test" (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2013, p. 326).

3.3.2.2. "There are two types of criterion-related validity evidence: concurrent and predictive The concurrent validity evidence for a test is determined by administering both the new test and the established test to a group of respondents, then finding the correlation between the two sets of test scores. If there exists an established test (criterion) in which most people have confidence, criterion-related validity evidence provides a good method Predictive validity evidence refers to how well the test predicts some future behavior of the examinees" (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2013, p.326).

3.4. Construct Validity Evidence

3.4.1. "A test has construct validity evidence if its relationship to other information corresponds well with some theory" (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2013, p. 329).