IdInterOp

1. Introduction

2. Problem Statement

3. Standards

3.1. SAML 2.0

3.1.1. Assertion

3.1.2. Protocol

3.1.3. Encryption

3.1.4. Signature

3.1.5. Profiles

3.2. OpenID 2.0

3.3. InfoCard

3.3.1. CardSpace

3.4. XRI

4. CardSpace

4.1. Methods

4.1.1. Self-issued card

4.1.2. Managed Card

4.1.3. Kerberos Ticket

4.1.4. X.509 Cert

4.2. Identity Selector Interoperability Profile

4.3. Mechanisms

4.3.1. WS-Trust

4.3.2. WS-SecurityPolicy

4.3.3. WS-MetadataExchange

5. Higgins

5.1. Components

5.1.1. i-cards

5.1.2. IDAS

5.1.3. Identity Selector

5.2. Digital Me

6. Background

6.1. MS Passport

6.2. Single Sign On

7. Scope

8. Laws of Identity

8.1. 1. User Control and Consent

8.2. 2. Limited Disclosure for Limited Use

8.3. 3. The Law of Fewest Parties

8.4. 4. Directed Identity

8.5. 5. Pluralism of Operators and Technologies

8.6. 6. Human Integration

8.7. 7. Consistent Experience Across Contexts

9. Project Initiatives

9.1. Higgins

9.2. OSIS

9.3. Pamela

9.4. Concordia

10. Use Cases

10.1. Authenticate to a CardSpace enabled relying party using an OpenID URL identifier

10.2. Authenticate to a OpenID enabled relying party with a CardSpace card over CardSpace protocol

10.3. Cardspace enabled SAML Attribute Authority for attribute exchange

10.4. OpenID enabled SAML Attribute Authority for attribute exchange

10.5. Authenticate to a Cardspace enabled relying party with Higgins iCard

10.6. Higgins enabled SAML Attribute Authority context provider

10.7. Authenticate to a Higgins enabled relying party with OpenID URL identifier

11. Questions?

11.1. Difference between Higgins i-card & CardSpace Infocards

12. Comparison

12.1. SAML vs OpenID

12.2. SAML vs CardSpace

12.3. OpenID vs CardSpace