1. ARCHITECTURE
1.1. 8051
1.1.1. 1)Harvard architecture, 8-bit microcontroller
1.1.2. 2)Integrated peripherals (timers, UART)
1.2. 8086
1.2.1. 1)CISC architecture, 16-bit processor
1.2.2. 2)Segmented memory model
1.3. ARM
1.3.1. 1)RISC architecture, 32/64-bit
1.3.2. 2)Power-efficient, pipeline design
1.4. ARDUINO
1.4.1. 1)AVR-based, 8-bit or 32-bit
1.4.2. 2)Open-source, easy-to-use platform
2. KEY DIFFERENCES
2.1. 8051 vs 8086
2.1.1. 8051:Microcontroller, application-specific 8086: Microprocessor, for general computing
2.2. ARM vs ARDUINO
2.2.1. ARM: High-performance, low power for professional use Arduino: Accessible for simple projects and prototyping
2.3. 8051 vs ARDUINO
2.3.1. 8051:Basic, industry applications Arduino:Community-supported, flexible for broader use
3. IMPACTS OF ARCHITECTURE ON INTERFACING & USAGE
3.1. 8051
3.1.1. 1)Simple interfacing, suited for embedded systems 2)Limited for complex applications
3.2. 8086
3.2.1. Efficient memory interfacing, suitable for moderate processing needs
3.3. ARM
3.3.1. Versatile interfacing, suited for mobile and IoT devices
3.4. ARDUINO
3.4.1. User-friendly for DIY projects, limited power and memory
4. APPLICATIONS
4.1. 8051
4.1.1. Home appliances, automotive, embedded control 8086
4.2. 8086
4.2.1. Robotics, early PCs, industrial controls
4.3. ARM
4.3.1. Mobile devices, IoT, automotive, wearables
4.4. ARDUINO
4.4.1. DIY, prototyping, educational projects, simple robotics
5. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
5.1. 8051
5.1.1. Potential for IoT integration, sensor connectivity
5.2. 8086
5.2.1. Low-cost automation, possible retrofitting
5.3. ARM
5.3.1. Enhanced AI integration, secure IoT applications
5.4. ARDUINO
5.4.1. AI and IoT kit integration, new models with energy efficiency