THE TALE OF MELON CITY

1. impact

1.1. The interference of king on public was less.

1.2. Public enjoyed the life

1.3. They did not need any King at all

2. Point of view of analysis

2.1. Writer wants to criticize the concept of Laissez faire

2.2. The inefficient political system is highlighted

3. A King ruled a city

3.1. A show off king was he

3.2. Tried to present himself as placid and just

3.3. He desires an arch to be made

3.4. Worksmen were asked to construct the arch

3.5. Arch gets constructed

4. An arch

4.1. An arch was a bit short

4.2. King orders an inquiry

4.3. Blame game is made

4.4. no body could be punished

4.5. public becomes restless

5. result

5.1. King was hanged

5.2. new king was to be chosen

6. criteria for new king

6.1. A man who passes the gate in morning irst will be the person to declare the king in future.

6.2. A lunatic was the first to cross the gate.

6.3. He chose a melon as king

7. outcome

7.1. Melon ruled the country

7.2. Country got its name as melon city

7.3. This tale continues in the city